<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 727 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196313</link>
    <description>The Judicial Member allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06 in part and the appeal for the assessment year 2006-07 entirely for statistical purposes. The Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of the Annual Letting Value was deemed unfounded, and it was directed to consider standard rent or the latest BMC valuation for determining the ALV for the relevant years, as per the order pronounced on 25th April 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 727 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196313</link>
      <description>The Judicial Member allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06 in part and the appeal for the assessment year 2006-07 entirely for statistical purposes. The Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of the Annual Letting Value was deemed unfounded, and it was directed to consider standard rent or the latest BMC valuation for determining the ALV for the relevant years, as per the order pronounced on 25th April 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>