https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196312 Order 1, Rule 10(2) CPC permits impleadment of a person whose direct legal or equitable interest in the subject-matter is necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid inconsistent decisions. In a partition suit, an agreement-holder who has paid part of the sale consideration may still have a recognised interest, including a possible statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, even though title has not passed. Because the applicant's rights would be affected by the partition and allotment, his presence was considered necessary for an equitable and final adjustment of the property, and refusal to implead him was set aside. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196312 Order 1, Rule 10(2) CPC permits impleadment of a person whose direct legal or equitable interest in the subject-matter is necessary for complete adjudication and to avoid inconsistent decisions. In a partition suit, an agreement-holder who has paid part of the sale consideration may still have a recognised interest, including a possible statutory charge under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, even though title has not passed. Because the applicant's rights would be affected by the partition and allotment, his presence was considered necessary for an equitable and final adjustment of the property, and refusal to implead him was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196312