<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1418 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revaluation of the land and crediting the revalued amount to partners&#039; capital accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. As there was no distribution of capital assets, section 45(4) was deemed inapplicable. The appeal was allowed, reducing the addition by the Assessing Officer to Rs. 63,12,50,000 instead of Rs. 63,12,80,810, granting a relief of Rs. 30,810 to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1418 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revaluation of the land and crediting the revalued amount to partners&#039; capital accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. As there was no distribution of capital assets, section 45(4) was deemed inapplicable. The appeal was allowed, reducing the addition by the Assessing Officer to Rs. 63,12,50,000 instead of Rs. 63,12,80,810, granting a relief of Rs. 30,810 to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>