<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1398 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for service tax and penalty were unsustainable due to being time-barred. The appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on amounts received from financial institutions for business promotion services was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the confusion surrounding taxability and the delay in issuing the show cause notice post a relevant decision. The Tribunal emphasized the department&#039;s failure to promptly act after the decision, deeming the proceedings time-barred and setting aside the order while allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1398 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for service tax and penalty were unsustainable due to being time-barred. The appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on amounts received from financial institutions for business promotion services was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the confusion surrounding taxability and the delay in issuing the show cause notice post a relevant decision. The Tribunal emphasized the department&#039;s failure to promptly act after the decision, deeming the proceedings time-barred and setting aside the order while allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>