https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351518 The appeal against the rejection of the appeal and upholding of the Order-in-Original regarding availing depreciation on CENVAT credit in violation of Rule 4(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was considered. The Commissioner(Appeals) dismissed both appeals but the Judicial Member remanded the case back to the original authority for verification on whether the appellant had actually taken the depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act. The remand was to ensure a thorough examination and a fresh order in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further investigation. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:49:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351518 The appeal against the rejection of the appeal and upholding of the Order-in-Original regarding availing depreciation on CENVAT credit in violation of Rule 4(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was considered. The Commissioner(Appeals) dismissed both appeals but the Judicial Member remanded the case back to the original authority for verification on whether the appellant had actually taken the depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act. The remand was to ensure a thorough examination and a fresh order in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further investigation. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351518