<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1396 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) due to failure to address crucial contentions raised by the appellants regarding the nature of the Pure Agent relationship and basis of reimbursement. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to review all submissions and agreements, providing specific findings and ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1396 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) due to failure to address crucial contentions raised by the appellants regarding the nature of the Pure Agent relationship and basis of reimbursement. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to review all submissions and agreements, providing specific findings and ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>