<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 87 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10752</link>
    <description>The court dismissed two connected writ appeals challenging an assessment notice under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies, the court highlighted the importance of following the hierarchy of appeals provided by the statute before resorting to writ jurisdiction, particularly in tax matters. It clarified the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) post-amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, stating that the appellate authority can decide the entire matter without remanding it to the Assessing Officer. The judgment underscored the discouragement of using writ jurisdiction for interim relief and dismissed both writ appeals without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 87 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10752</link>
      <description>The court dismissed two connected writ appeals challenging an assessment notice under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies, the court highlighted the importance of following the hierarchy of appeals provided by the statute before resorting to writ jurisdiction, particularly in tax matters. It clarified the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) post-amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, stating that the appellate authority can decide the entire matter without remanding it to the Assessing Officer. The judgment underscored the discouragement of using writ jurisdiction for interim relief and dismissed both writ appeals without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>