<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, in the case concerning the valuation of clinker transferred to a sister unit under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, resolved the dispute by applying Rule 8 for assessing duty at 110% of the cost of production. Relying on the updated Rule and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, emphasizing consistent application of valuation rules in different scenarios. The decision aligned with precedent and clarified the correct valuation method for stock transfers to sister units, setting aside the Revenue&#039;s position advocating for Rule 4 based on transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1385 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, in the case concerning the valuation of clinker transferred to a sister unit under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, resolved the dispute by applying Rule 8 for assessing duty at 110% of the cost of production. Relying on the updated Rule and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, emphasizing consistent application of valuation rules in different scenarios. The decision aligned with precedent and clarified the correct valuation method for stock transfers to sister units, setting aside the Revenue&#039;s position advocating for Rule 4 based on transaction value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>