<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1380 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351501</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed a remand for fresh decision on the finalization of provisional assessment in a case concerning the valuation of lubricating oil for excise duty purposes. The tribunal emphasized the requirement of actual evidence to support discount claims, rejecting equated discounts without legal provision. The appellant was granted an opportunity to provide supporting evidence, with the tribunal instructing the original authority to examine invoices and documents for accurate valuation. All appeals were allowed for remand to finalize assessments based on the appellant&#039;s submitted evidence, including for the calendar year 2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1380 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351501</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed a remand for fresh decision on the finalization of provisional assessment in a case concerning the valuation of lubricating oil for excise duty purposes. The tribunal emphasized the requirement of actual evidence to support discount claims, rejecting equated discounts without legal provision. The appellant was granted an opportunity to provide supporting evidence, with the tribunal instructing the original authority to examine invoices and documents for accurate valuation. All appeals were allowed for remand to finalize assessments based on the appellant&#039;s submitted evidence, including for the calendar year 2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>