<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1376 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351497</link>
    <description>A request for short adjournment to file objections against a pre-assessment notice cannot be treated as a substantive objection on merits. Where the assessee has not been given a proper opportunity to submit objections and be heard, the assessment must be reopened and reconsidered afresh in accordance with law. The authority must treat the impugned assessment communication as a show cause notice, permit filing of objections, grant a personal hearing, and then redo the assessment after considering the response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1376 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351497</link>
      <description>A request for short adjournment to file objections against a pre-assessment notice cannot be treated as a substantive objection on merits. Where the assessee has not been given a proper opportunity to submit objections and be heard, the assessment must be reopened and reconsidered afresh in accordance with law. The authority must treat the impugned assessment communication as a show cause notice, permit filing of objections, grant a personal hearing, and then redo the assessment after considering the response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>