<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351496</link>
    <description>The case involved the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition of Rs. 2,71,00,000/- under Section 69A based on evidence from search and seizure operations. The CIT(A) upheld the validity of the reopening under Section 147 but allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the addition under Section 69A, stating that the AO&#039;s actions were arbitrary and lacked supporting evidence. The Tribunal set aside the matter and directed the AO to provide the assessee with seized material, allow rebuttal, and ensure natural justice principles in the assessment. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351496</link>
      <description>The case involved the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition of Rs. 2,71,00,000/- under Section 69A based on evidence from search and seizure operations. The CIT(A) upheld the validity of the reopening under Section 147 but allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the addition under Section 69A, stating that the AO&#039;s actions were arbitrary and lacked supporting evidence. The Tribunal set aside the matter and directed the AO to provide the assessee with seized material, allow rebuttal, and ensure natural justice principles in the assessment. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>