<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the royalty payment as revenue expenditure, following legal precedents and considering the nature of the payment for trademark licenses in the service industry. The decision was based on the lack of enduring benefit and the specific terms of the agreement, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1362 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the royalty payment as revenue expenditure, following legal precedents and considering the nature of the payment for trademark licenses in the service industry. The decision was based on the lack of enduring benefit and the specific terms of the agreement, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>