<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1355 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351476</link>
    <description>The petition challenging the notice and order dated 28.3.2011 and 19.12.2011 under the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the court. The court emphasized the need for tangible material for reassessment and ruled that reassessment should not be solely based on a change of opinion. The court found the reassessment in this case to be justified based on tangible material, and the objections raised by the petitioner were deemed insufficient to challenge the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1355 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351476</link>
      <description>The petition challenging the notice and order dated 28.3.2011 and 19.12.2011 under the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the court. The court emphasized the need for tangible material for reassessment and ruled that reassessment should not be solely based on a change of opinion. The court found the reassessment in this case to be justified based on tangible material, and the objections raised by the petitioner were deemed insufficient to challenge the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>