<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1345 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351466</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowed labour charges and rejecting the addition from the savings bank account as undisclosed income. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough verification in tax assessments, highlighting that disallowances should not be arbitrary and must be supported by concrete proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1345 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351466</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowed labour charges and rejecting the addition from the savings bank account as undisclosed income. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough verification in tax assessments, highlighting that disallowances should not be arbitrary and must be supported by concrete proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>