<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the original petitioner ineligible to file the Company Petition under section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956. The application by the interveners to implead as petitioners was dismissed, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the original petition. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria at the time of filing a petition under the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1338 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the original petitioner ineligible to file the Company Petition under section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956. The application by the interveners to implead as petitioners was dismissed, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the original petition. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria at the time of filing a petition under the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>