<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1337 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for revival/restoration of a company&#039;s name on the register of the Registrar of Companies. The company failed to demonstrate ongoing business activities at the time of striking off and did not comply with the required paid-up capital increase for private companies. The Registrar&#039;s decision to strike off the company&#039;s name was upheld, with the petitioners bearing costs of &amp;amp;8377; 20,000 for lack of merit and statutory non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:05:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1337 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for revival/restoration of a company&#039;s name on the register of the Registrar of Companies. The company failed to demonstrate ongoing business activities at the time of striking off and did not comply with the required paid-up capital increase for private companies. The Registrar&#039;s decision to strike off the company&#039;s name was upheld, with the petitioners bearing costs of &amp;amp;8377; 20,000 for lack of merit and statutory non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>