<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1324 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of transportation charges in the assessable value of PSC Poles for electricity distribution, based on the contract terms indicating the sale&#039;s completion at the client&#039;s depot. Duty demands were limited to the normal period, with the penalty imposed on the appellant set aside due to lack of evidence of suppression or intention to evade payment. A re-calculation of duty liability based on cum-duty valuation was allowed, subject to satisfactory verification by the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1324 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of transportation charges in the assessable value of PSC Poles for electricity distribution, based on the contract terms indicating the sale&#039;s completion at the client&#039;s depot. Duty demands were limited to the normal period, with the penalty imposed on the appellant set aside due to lack of evidence of suppression or intention to evade payment. A re-calculation of duty liability based on cum-duty valuation was allowed, subject to satisfactory verification by the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>