<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 84 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10740</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal regarding reassessment for the assessment year 1988-89. The court found that failure to record reasons before issuing notice under section 148 rendered the reassessment proceedings invalid. Emphasizing the mandatory requirement of recording reasons, the court highlighted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction on income escapement is crucial for assuming jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the court reiterated that reasons must be recorded before issuing notice to prove the belief of income escapement. As reasons were recorded after issuing notices in this case, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding the reassessment was initiated without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 84 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10740</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal regarding reassessment for the assessment year 1988-89. The court found that failure to record reasons before issuing notice under section 148 rendered the reassessment proceedings invalid. Emphasizing the mandatory requirement of recording reasons, the court highlighted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction on income escapement is crucial for assuming jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the court reiterated that reasons must be recorded before issuing notice to prove the belief of income escapement. As reasons were recorded after issuing notices in this case, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding the reassessment was initiated without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>