https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196295 The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of transportation costs in the assessable value for Central Excise duty calculation. The Original Adjudicating Authority confirmed a duty demand, including freight charges, which the appellant contested. It was found that the lower authority had mistakenly added transportation costs from the depot to customers' premises instead of from the warehouse to the depot. As a result, the matter was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for precise assessment and adherence to valuation rules in determining duty payable. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Nov 2017 21:26:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196295 The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of transportation costs in the assessable value for Central Excise duty calculation. The Original Adjudicating Authority confirmed a duty demand, including freight charges, which the appellant contested. It was found that the lower authority had mistakenly added transportation costs from the depot to customers' premises instead of from the warehouse to the depot. As a result, the matter was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for precise assessment and adherence to valuation rules in determining duty payable. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196295