<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set off excess deposit against the demand without imposing interest or penalty in a tax dispute case. The Tribunal found that since the deposit covered the demanded amounts, there was no justification for additional charges. The decision emphasized that when the demand is satisfied by an existing deposit, imposing further charges is unwarranted to prevent double recovery by tax authorities. Consequently, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the principle that once the demand is met, additional financial burdens like interest or penalty should not be imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 21:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set off excess deposit against the demand without imposing interest or penalty in a tax dispute case. The Tribunal found that since the deposit covered the demanded amounts, there was no justification for additional charges. The decision emphasized that when the demand is satisfied by an existing deposit, imposing further charges is unwarranted to prevent double recovery by tax authorities. Consequently, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the principle that once the demand is met, additional financial burdens like interest or penalty should not be imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>