<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1255 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196298</link>
    <description>Prior contractual security rights over project assets and receivables cannot be diluted by a proposed corporate debt restructuring package without the secured lender&#039;s consent. Where loan, hypothecation and escrow arrangements grant an exclusive charge, a restructuring proposal cannot compel sharing of that security, pooling of receivables into a common account, or acceptance of additional funding terms that alter the lender&#039;s bargain. The interim restraint against further encumbrance was maintained, and the plaintiff&#039;s pre-existing security over the specified assets remained protected. The restructuring could proceed only outside the plaintiff&#039;s secured interest, preserving the contractual protections already created.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 21:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1255 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196298</link>
      <description>Prior contractual security rights over project assets and receivables cannot be diluted by a proposed corporate debt restructuring package without the secured lender&#039;s consent. Where loan, hypothecation and escrow arrangements grant an exclusive charge, a restructuring proposal cannot compel sharing of that security, pooling of receivables into a common account, or acceptance of additional funding terms that alter the lender&#039;s bargain. The interim restraint against further encumbrance was maintained, and the plaintiff&#039;s pre-existing security over the specified assets remained protected. The restructuring could proceed only outside the plaintiff&#039;s secured interest, preserving the contractual protections already created.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>