<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 77 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10739</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeal by the Revenue, remanding the assessment to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The lower appellate forums&#039; decisions were set aside, emphasizing the importance of the assessee providing documented evidence to substantiate purchases. The court highlighted the distinction between turnover and net income, directing thorough verification by the Assessing Officer and prompt conclusion of the inquiry within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 77 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10739</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeal by the Revenue, remanding the assessment to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The lower appellate forums&#039; decisions were set aside, emphasizing the importance of the assessee providing documented evidence to substantiate purchases. The court highlighted the distinction between turnover and net income, directing thorough verification by the Assessing Officer and prompt conclusion of the inquiry within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>