<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1313 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351434</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the decision in favor of the Assessee regarding royalty payment to SEC Korea based on previous orders and dismissed the appeal concerning the provision of warranty/after-sale service compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1313 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351434</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the decision in favor of the Assessee regarding royalty payment to SEC Korea based on previous orders and dismissed the appeal concerning the provision of warranty/after-sale service compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>