<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351433</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law warranting interference with the ITAT&#039;s order. The decisions of the CIT (A) and the ITAT on exemption application, condonation of delay, interpretation of Income Tax Act, treatment of reimbursement, advertisement and sales promotion expenses, expenses on computer software and recruitment/training, and deemed income issue were upheld. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1312 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351433</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law warranting interference with the ITAT&#039;s order. The decisions of the CIT (A) and the ITAT on exemption application, condonation of delay, interpretation of Income Tax Act, treatment of reimbursement, advertisement and sales promotion expenses, expenses on computer software and recruitment/training, and deemed income issue were upheld. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>