https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196283 Where a statute provides a specific revisional remedy against Wakf Tribunal orders, civil revision petitions under Article 227 are not ordinarily maintainable and must be treated, if at all, within the statutory revisional jurisdiction. The Tribunal's interim injunction against alienation of the Manikonda lands was upheld because notified wakf entries, the errata notification, earlier records and government documents showed a strong prima facie wakf claim; the errata was treated as relating back to the original notification. The injunction was also justified to prevent third-party interests, multiplicity of litigation and prejudice to wakf property, though one survey-number issue was left for clarification before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:34:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196283 Where a statute provides a specific revisional remedy against Wakf Tribunal orders, civil revision petitions under Article 227 are not ordinarily maintainable and must be treated, if at all, within the statutory revisional jurisdiction. The Tribunal's interim injunction against alienation of the Manikonda lands was upheld because notified wakf entries, the errata notification, earlier records and government documents showed a strong prima facie wakf claim; the errata was treated as relating back to the original notification. The injunction was also justified to prevent third-party interests, multiplicity of litigation and prejudice to wakf property, though one survey-number issue was left for clarification before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196283