<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DELAY IN FILING WRIT PETITION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7740</link>
    <description>Delay and laches bar belated writ petitions where petitioners fail to explain non-pursuit of available statutory remedies; passive reliance on outcomes in other cases constitutes acquiescence and may disqualify similarly situated persons from extension of relief. Courts will scrutinise non-challenge of administrative orders and interim payments made under coercion, and may exercise equitable discretion to mitigate penal consequences when a tax is found not payable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DELAY IN FILING WRIT PETITION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7740</link>
      <description>Delay and laches bar belated writ petitions where petitioners fail to explain non-pursuit of available statutory remedies; passive reliance on outcomes in other cases constitutes acquiescence and may disqualify similarly situated persons from extension of relief. Courts will scrutinise non-challenge of administrative orders and interim payments made under coercion, and may exercise equitable discretion to mitigate penal consequences when a tax is found not payable in law.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:17:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>