<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1291 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196279</link>
    <description>A suit by joint claimants challenging a guardian&#039;s sale of minor&#039;s property and seeking possession is governed by Article 60 of the Limitation Act, 1963, because it is in substance a suit to set aside a transfer made in contravention of Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. Articles 109 and 110 do not apply, as they concern alienation by a father of ancestral property and exclusion from joint family property, while Article 113 is residuary. Section 7 of the Limitation Act, read with its Explanation, preserves limitation where the relevant plaintiff attains majority, and the suit was held to have been filed within three years of that date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1291 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196279</link>
      <description>A suit by joint claimants challenging a guardian&#039;s sale of minor&#039;s property and seeking possession is governed by Article 60 of the Limitation Act, 1963, because it is in substance a suit to set aside a transfer made in contravention of Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. Articles 109 and 110 do not apply, as they concern alienation by a father of ancestral property and exclusion from joint family property, while Article 113 is residuary. Section 7 of the Limitation Act, read with its Explanation, preserves limitation where the relevant plaintiff attains majority, and the suit was held to have been filed within three years of that date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>