https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351422 The court upheld the decision to recall the winding-up order of the Respondent Company due to non-compliance with Rule 28 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Judge's ruling to condone the delay in filing the application and setting aside the winding-up order. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering strictly to procedural rules in cases involving substantial implications like the winding-up of a company. en-us Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:29:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351422 The court upheld the decision to recall the winding-up order of the Respondent Company due to non-compliance with Rule 28 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Single Judge's ruling to condone the delay in filing the application and setting aside the winding-up order. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering strictly to procedural rules in cases involving substantial implications like the winding-up of a company. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351422