<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1280 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351401</link>
    <description>The impugned order confirming clandestine clearance and denying cross-examination was set aside. The court emphasized compliance with Section 9D procedures and reevaluation of evidence, stressing procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards. The case was remanded for proper adjudication, highlighting the importance of principles of natural justice and statutory provisions in evidentiary matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1280 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351401</link>
      <description>The impugned order confirming clandestine clearance and denying cross-examination was set aside. The court emphasized compliance with Section 9D procedures and reevaluation of evidence, stressing procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards. The case was remanded for proper adjudication, highlighting the importance of principles of natural justice and statutory provisions in evidentiary matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>