<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1263 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351384</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the dropped demand of service tax for most services provided by the respondent, except for Tata Tele Services, due to the absence of Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) machines. The conflicting views on the interpretation of the taxable service definition led to the involvement of a Third Member for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1263 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351384</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the dropped demand of service tax for most services provided by the respondent, except for Tata Tele Services, due to the absence of Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) machines. The conflicting views on the interpretation of the taxable service definition led to the involvement of a Third Member for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>