<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1260 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351381</link>
    <description>The petition was rejected due to the existence of a genuine dispute between the parties and the invalidity of the demand notice. The Tribunal concluded that the petition did not meet the necessary legal requirements for admission under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1260 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351381</link>
      <description>The petition was rejected due to the existence of a genuine dispute between the parties and the invalidity of the demand notice. The Tribunal concluded that the petition did not meet the necessary legal requirements for admission under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>