<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the original authority was justified in sanctioning the refund for the excess payment of Service Tax. The Tribunal found no legal basis for withholding the refund based on the pending appeal by the Revenue, especially as the Revenue&#039;s appeal had already been dismissed. The Tribunal concluded that the excess payment by the appellant was not in dispute, and therefore allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 06:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the original authority was justified in sanctioning the refund for the excess payment of Service Tax. The Tribunal found no legal basis for withholding the refund based on the pending appeal by the Revenue, especially as the Revenue&#039;s appeal had already been dismissed. The Tribunal concluded that the excess payment by the appellant was not in dispute, and therefore allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>