<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196269</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial decision under Section 68D(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 must comply with natural justice, so the decision-maker must act objectively, fairly and impartially. Personal bias, if proved, disqualifies the authority from deciding the objections. On the affidavit evidence, allegations that the Minister had sought electoral support from the Managing Director, reacted adversely on refusal, and later dealt with the transport objections were substantially corroborated by surrounding circumstances and supporting affidavits. The High Court&#039;s appreciation of the evidence was left undisturbed, and the plea of personal bias was accepted, rendering the approval order invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196269</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial decision under Section 68D(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 must comply with natural justice, so the decision-maker must act objectively, fairly and impartially. Personal bias, if proved, disqualifies the authority from deciding the objections. On the affidavit evidence, allegations that the Minister had sought electoral support from the Managing Director, reacted adversely on refusal, and later dealt with the transport objections were substantially corroborated by surrounding circumstances and supporting affidavits. The High Court&#039;s appreciation of the evidence was left undisturbed, and the plea of personal bias was accepted, rendering the approval order invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>