<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196263</link>
    <description>A party seeking cancellation of a sale deed and recovery of possession under the Specific Relief Act must establish a clear equitable entitlement and approach the court with clean hands. Relief may be refused where the claimant&#039;s own conduct contributed to the failed completion of registration, material facts were withheld, an alleged interim arrangement postponing payment was treated as binding, and the suit was brought after a long delay. On those facts, the claim for rescission, cancellation of the instrument, and possession failed because delay, suppression, and inconsistent conduct disentitled the claimant to equitable assistance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:41:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 972 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196263</link>
      <description>A party seeking cancellation of a sale deed and recovery of possession under the Specific Relief Act must establish a clear equitable entitlement and approach the court with clean hands. Relief may be refused where the claimant&#039;s own conduct contributed to the failed completion of registration, material facts were withheld, an alleged interim arrangement postponing payment was treated as binding, and the suit was brought after a long delay. On those facts, the claim for rescission, cancellation of the instrument, and possession failed because delay, suppression, and inconsistent conduct disentitled the claimant to equitable assistance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>