<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1207 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the matters back to the assessing officer for further verification regarding the unexplained cash deposits and the nature of the property for Section 54F deduction. The assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the opening cash balance were dismissed due to lack of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1207 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the matters back to the assessing officer for further verification regarding the unexplained cash deposits and the nature of the property for Section 54F deduction. The assessee&#039;s appeals regarding the opening cash balance were dismissed due to lack of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>