<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1198 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351319</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IA for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09, but the Tribunal remitted the matter back due to a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal directed reconsideration, emphasizing the need to consider all material on record. Regarding the penalty for late safety arrangement for the assessment year 2009-10, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow it as a business expenditure. The appeals of the Revenue were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remitted for a fresh decision with proper opportunities for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1198 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351319</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IA for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09, but the Tribunal remitted the matter back due to a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal directed reconsideration, emphasizing the need to consider all material on record. Regarding the penalty for late safety arrangement for the assessment year 2009-10, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow it as a business expenditure. The appeals of the Revenue were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remitted for a fresh decision with proper opportunities for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>