<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351312</link>
    <description>Reliable data for cooperating export channels permitted the authority to fix separate anti-dumping duty rates for those exporters and to place the non-cooperating channel in a residual category. The investigation was also found unobjectionable because the supporting producers qualified as domestic industry, disclosure and hearing opportunities were provided, and interested parties had time to respond. For normal value, the authority could rely on best available information where market economy treatment was not claimed. The injury analysis was upheld because dumped imports were assessed cumulatively, volume and price effects were examined, and alternative causes of injury were considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351312</link>
      <description>Reliable data for cooperating export channels permitted the authority to fix separate anti-dumping duty rates for those exporters and to place the non-cooperating channel in a residual category. The investigation was also found unobjectionable because the supporting producers qualified as domestic industry, disclosure and hearing opportunities were provided, and interested parties had time to respond. For normal value, the authority could rely on best available information where market economy treatment was not claimed. The injury analysis was upheld because dumped imports were assessed cumulatively, volume and price effects were examined, and alternative causes of injury were considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>