<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351299</link>
    <description>Mobile telescopic towers cleared as complete units mounted on chassis or trailers were treated as special purpose motor vehicles under Heading 8705, because classification follows the goods&#039; essential character and the form in which they are cleared, not an earlier self-assessment under a different heading. The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE depended on proof that duty had already been paid on the chassis and equipment, so the condition required verification. If the condition was not met, valuation had to be redetermined, including the value of free-supplied chassis where applicable; where chassis were purchased and duty had already been discharged, no further dispute arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351299</link>
      <description>Mobile telescopic towers cleared as complete units mounted on chassis or trailers were treated as special purpose motor vehicles under Heading 8705, because classification follows the goods&#039; essential character and the form in which they are cleared, not an earlier self-assessment under a different heading. The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE depended on proof that duty had already been paid on the chassis and equipment, so the condition required verification. If the condition was not met, valuation had to be redetermined, including the value of free-supplied chassis where applicable; where chassis were purchased and duty had already been discharged, no further dispute arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>