<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1177 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351298</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order due to lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion allegations. It emphasized the importance of substantiated claims in excise duty matters, allowing the appeal. Accurate reporting, timely submission of revised certificates, and application of legal principles like revenue neutrality in inter-unit transactions were highlighted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1177 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351298</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order due to lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion allegations. It emphasized the importance of substantiated claims in excise duty matters, allowing the appeal. Accurate reporting, timely submission of revised certificates, and application of legal principles like revenue neutrality in inter-unit transactions were highlighted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>