https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351292 The appellant appealed against the denial of compensation for goods seized by the Revenue during recovery proceedings. The Tribunal found that despite the goods being perishable and deteriorating in the Revenue's custody, the appellant was entitled to compensation as the goods became obsolete. The impugned order denying compensation was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the obligation to maintain seized goods and the Revenue's liability for any loss or deterioration while in their custody. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351292 The appellant appealed against the denial of compensation for goods seized by the Revenue during recovery proceedings. The Tribunal found that despite the goods being perishable and deteriorating in the Revenue's custody, the appellant was entitled to compensation as the goods became obsolete. The impugned order denying compensation was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the obligation to maintain seized goods and the Revenue's liability for any loss or deterioration while in their custody. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351292