<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1167 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351288</link>
    <description>The appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit, duty demand, interest, and penalty imposition was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant failed to prove receipt of goods as required, leading to the denial of Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal upheld the burden placed on the appellant to prove receipt and use of goods, as per specific directions in this case, differentiating it from previous cases. The impugned order was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s failure to meet the burden of proof, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1167 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351288</link>
      <description>The appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit, duty demand, interest, and penalty imposition was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant failed to prove receipt of goods as required, leading to the denial of Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal upheld the burden placed on the appellant to prove receipt and use of goods, as per specific directions in this case, differentiating it from previous cases. The impugned order was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s failure to meet the burden of proof, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>