<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 82 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10712</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, a cooperative sugar mill, in a case involving the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,32,685 by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court determined that the deposits collected were intended for the issuance of shares in the future and were not to be considered as trading receipts. The Court emphasized the distinction between revenue receipts and deposits for share issuance, ultimately upholding the decision of the Tribunal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 82 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10712</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, a cooperative sugar mill, in a case involving the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,32,685 by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court determined that the deposits collected were intended for the issuance of shares in the future and were not to be considered as trading receipts. The Court emphasized the distinction between revenue receipts and deposits for share issuance, ultimately upholding the decision of the Tribunal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>