<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence for additions under Section 69B and validating the use of Municipal ratable value for determining ALV of vacant properties. The appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the contested additions and dismissing the legal issue as academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1721 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence for additions under Section 69B and validating the use of Municipal ratable value for determining ALV of vacant properties. The appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the contested additions and dismissing the legal issue as academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>