<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196230</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh, in a judgment by Bhavnesh Saini and Annapurna Gupta, restored an appeal dismissed for default due to non-receipt of notice. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation for missing the hearing date, acknowledging a sufficient cause for non-appearance. The appeal was reinstated, granting the assessee an opportunity to present the case on its merits. The Tribunal ordered the next hearing without a separate notice, emphasizing the importance of parties tracking hearing schedules. This decision demonstrates a fair and just approach to rectifying procedural errors and ensuring a full hearing on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196230</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh, in a judgment by Bhavnesh Saini and Annapurna Gupta, restored an appeal dismissed for default due to non-receipt of notice. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation for missing the hearing date, acknowledging a sufficient cause for non-appearance. The appeal was reinstated, granting the assessee an opportunity to present the case on its merits. The Tribunal ordered the next hearing without a separate notice, emphasizing the importance of parties tracking hearing schedules. This decision demonstrates a fair and just approach to rectifying procedural errors and ensuring a full hearing on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>