<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1075 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196244</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no justification for further disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT held that since the assessee had sufficient own funds and had already made a voluntary disallowance, there was no need for additional disallowance. The appeal was allowed, reversing the order of the FAA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1075 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196244</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no justification for further disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT held that since the assessee had sufficient own funds and had already made a voluntary disallowance, there was no need for additional disallowance. The appeal was allowed, reversing the order of the FAA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>