<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10709</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the writ petition, directing a review of the rejected extension applications for realisation of export consignments under section 80HHC(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of non-discriminatory decision-making and consistent application of extension provisions, setting aside the initial order and highlighting the need for fair treatment in granting extensions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10709</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the writ petition, directing a review of the rejected extension applications for realisation of export consignments under section 80HHC(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the importance of non-discriminatory decision-making and consistent application of extension provisions, setting aside the initial order and highlighting the need for fair treatment in granting extensions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>