<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>COST ON ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7736</link>
    <description>Adjudicating authorities must observe natural justice by providing reasonable, effective opportunity to be heard and by considering evidence before raising demands or ordering confiscation; fixing successive hearing dates without meaningful notice or passing ex parte orders without verifying defence is a breach that warrants judicial scrutiny, fresh adjudication after a fair hearing, and may attract personal costs against authorities who misuse adjudicatory power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:44:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>COST ON ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7736</link>
      <description>Adjudicating authorities must observe natural justice by providing reasonable, effective opportunity to be heard and by considering evidence before raising demands or ordering confiscation; fixing successive hearing dates without meaningful notice or passing ex parte orders without verifying defence is a breach that warrants judicial scrutiny, fresh adjudication after a fair hearing, and may attract personal costs against authorities who misuse adjudicatory power.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:44:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>