<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 79 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10707</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that only liabilities pertaining to the new industrial undertaking should be deducted from the aggregate value of assets for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The judgment resolved the issue in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that only liabilities of the new unit should be considered for deduction, resulting in a lower relief amount for the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 79 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10707</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that only liabilities pertaining to the new industrial undertaking should be deducted from the aggregate value of assets for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The judgment resolved the issue in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that only liabilities of the new unit should be considered for deduction, resulting in a lower relief amount for the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>