<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (10) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196218</link>
    <description>The amended law governing protected tenancies applied where the landlord&#039;s notice was issued before the amendment but the notice period expired after it commenced. The right to possession arose only on expiry of the notice and termination of the tenancy, so no vested right existed before that date. The amendment did not invalidate the earlier notice; it regulated the landlord&#039;s enforceable claim to possession when that right accrued. Because the statutory scheme was tenant-protective, the law in force on the date the right to possession arose controlled the claim, and possession was not available under the unamended position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=497263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (10) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196218</link>
      <description>The amended law governing protected tenancies applied where the landlord&#039;s notice was issued before the amendment but the notice period expired after it commenced. The right to possession arose only on expiry of the notice and termination of the tenancy, so no vested right existed before that date. The amendment did not invalidate the earlier notice; it regulated the landlord&#039;s enforceable claim to possession when that right accrued. Because the statutory scheme was tenant-protective, the law in force on the date the right to possession arose controlled the claim, and possession was not available under the unamended position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>