<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 49 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10705</link>
    <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA addressed the validity of a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reopening a case regarding the assessment year 1994-95 after four years. The court found that the authority lacked the power to reopen the case based on insufficient reasons provided, leading to the decision to set aside the notice. It emphasized the importance of complying with statutory conditions before assuming jurisdiction and preventing the abuse of power. The court concluded that the notice was issued illegally and without jurisdiction, setting it aside without costs in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 49 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10705</link>
      <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA addressed the validity of a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reopening a case regarding the assessment year 1994-95 after four years. The court found that the authority lacked the power to reopen the case based on insufficient reasons provided, leading to the decision to set aside the notice. It emphasized the importance of complying with statutory conditions before assuming jurisdiction and preventing the abuse of power. The court concluded that the notice was issued illegally and without jurisdiction, setting it aside without costs in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>